| // RUN: rm -rf %t |
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fimplicit-module-maps -I%S/Inputs/suggest-include %s -verify |
| |
| #include "empty.h" // import the module file |
| |
| // [email protected]:2 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| // [email protected]:1 {{previous}} |
| |
| void f() { |
| (void)::usetextual1; // expected-error {{missing '#include "usetextual1.h"'}} |
| (void)::usetextual2; // expected-error {{missing '#include "usetextual2.h"'}} |
| (void)::textual3; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}missing '#include "usetextual3.h"'}} |
| // Don't suggest a #include that includes the entity via a path that leaves |
| // the module. In that case we can't be sure that we've picked the right header. |
| (void)::textual4; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'textual4'}} |
| (void)::textual5; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'textual5'}} |
| |
| // Don't suggest #including a private header. |
| // FIXME: We could suggest including "useprivate1.h" here, as it's the only |
| // public way to get at this declaration. |
| (void)::private1; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private1'}} |
| // FIXME: Should we be suggesting an import at all here? Should declarations |
| // in private headers be visible when the surrounding module is imported? |
| (void)::private2; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private2'}} |
| // Even if we suggest an include for private1, we should not do so here. |
| (void)::private3; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private3'}} |
| } |