Stability: 1 - Experimental
tl;dr: You can land pull requests by adding the commit-queue label to it.
Commit Queue is an experimental feature for the project which simplifies the landing process by automating it via GitHub Actions. With it, collaborators can land pull requests by adding the commit-queue label to a PR. All checks will run via @node-core/utils, and if the pull request is ready to land, the Action will rebase it and push to main.
This document gives an overview of how the Commit Queue works, as well as implementation details, reasoning for design choices, and current limitations.
From a high-level, the Commit Queue works as follow:
commit-queue label to pull requests ready to landrequest-ci label (if it has, skip this PR since it's pending a CI run)commit-queue labelgit node land <pr> --oneCommitMaxgit node land sessioncommit-queue-failed label to the PRgit node landLanded in ...To make the Commit Queue squash all the commits of a pull request into the first one, add the commit-queue-squash label. To make the Commit Queue land a pull request containing several commits, add the commit-queue-rebase label. When using this option, make sure that all commits are self-contained, meaning every commit should pass all tests.
The Commit Queue feature is still in early stages, and as such it might not work for more complex pull requests. These are the currently known limitations of the commit queue:
fixup! commit that will be correctly handled by the --autosquash optionThe action will run on scheduler events every five minutes. Five minutes is the smallest number accepted by the scheduler. The scheduler is not guaranteed to run every five minutes, it might take longer between runs.
Using the scheduler is preferable over using pull_request_target for two reasons:
issue_comment event has the same limitation.pull_request_target will only run if the Action exists on the base commit of a pull request, and it will run the Action version present on that commit, meaning we wouldn't be able to use it for already opened PRs without rebasing them first.@node-core/utils is configured with a personal token and a Jenkins token from @nodejs-github-bot. octokit/graphql-action is used to fetch all pull requests with the commit-queue label. The output is a JSON payload, so jq is used to turn that into a list of PR ids we can pass as arguments to commit-queue.sh.
The personal token only needs permission for public repositories and to read profiles, we can use the GITHUB_TOKEN for write operations. Jenkins token is required to check CI status.
commit-queue.sh receives the following positional arguments:
The script will iterate over the pull requests. ncu-ci is used to check if the last CI is still pending, and calls to the GitHub API are used to check if the PR is waiting for CI to start (request-ci label). The PR is skipped if CI is pending. No other CI validation is done here since git node land will fail if the last CI failed.
The script removes the commit-queue label. It then runs git node land, forwarding stdout and stderr to a file. If any errors happen, git node land --abort is run, and then a commit-queue-failed label is added to the PR, as well as a comment with the output of git node land.
If no errors happen during git node land, the script will use the GITHUB_TOKEN to push the changes to main, and then will leave a Landed in ... comment in the PR, and then will close it. Iteration continues until all PRs have done the steps above.
Reverting broken commits is done manually by collaborators, just like when commits are landed manually via git node land. An easy way to revert is a good feature for the project, but is not explicitly required for the Commit Queue to work because the Action lands PRs just like collaborators do today. If once we start using the Commit Queue we notice that the number of required reverts increases drastically, we can pause the queue until a Revert Queue is implemented, but until then we can enable the Commit Queue and then work on a Revert Queue as a follow-up.